简介：电影改编自伊朗女插画家Marjane Satrapi的同名漫画，以自传的形式讲述了自己的成长经历，反映了伊朗的社会变迁。　　1979年之后，伊朗发起了伊斯兰教革命，社会动荡不安，革命的失败更使伊朗失去民主的希望，日渐保守，人民苦不堪言。九岁的Marjane早熟、敏感，她聪明地瞒过官方爪牙，迷上了西方朋克乐队和流行音乐，沉浸在自己的世界。　　两伊战争爆发之后，伊朗的生活更加艰难，Marjane渐渐长大，越来越大胆的行为让父母担心不已，她14岁那年，被父母送到了奥地利上学。　　在奥地利，Marjane身为一个伊朗人，不得不面对别人的歧视和自卑的情绪。当她终于克服了心理障碍，赢得大家认可的时候，爱情的伤痛和对家乡的思念，却使她决定回到父母身边。　　此时的伊朗，依然经历着战火的洗礼，宗教对妇女生活的限制越发严苛，Marjane开始怀疑自己是否应该在这个充满专制的国度继续生活下去。

简介：Iris, seize ans, vit la fin de son adolescence dans une petite ville de province lorsqu'elle rencontre par hasard Jean, un photographe parisien d'une quarantaine d'années. Au fil des rendez-vous, leur relation se transforme en une amitié amoureuse qui bouleverse leurs vies.

简介：

一个背井离乡的英俊的逃犯（第一次见阿兰德龙蓄胡子，差点儿没认出来）来到了一个小乡村，在一个寡妇家打工。寡妇独自一人经营农场，对面就住着亲戚，但是已经反目成仇。一个寡妇想要生存，必须坚毅、自强的——也许她并不受村民的喜爱，但是她也期盼温情和呵护……

简介：芭比，曾是一位迷人的、忠诚的母亲和伴侣。但在她步入55岁时，新的挑战如浪潮般涌来。在芭比与身份认同、人际关系纠纷等一系列人生危机斗争时，她惊觉整个人生早已陷入了黑暗、争夺与荒谬之中。

简介：21岁的透（冈田准一饰）爱上了母亲的朋友、年长他二十岁的已婚妇女诗史（黑木瞳饰），他们一见钟情并开始了地下恋情。透的好朋友耕二（松本润饰）也与家庭主妇喜美子（寺岛忍饰）有不伦关系，但情感十分复杂难解，他同时还有一位女友。　　三年来透听诗史喜欢的音乐，看诗史喜欢的书，每天下午在家等诗史打来的电话。他不能主动打给她，这是两人的约定。渐渐地，他越来越不能满足这样的关系，他向诗史提出了一起生活的要求。诗史是理性的，她清楚所拥有的一切都是丈夫给予的，离开丈夫意味着什么诗史清楚不过，所以对于透提出的要求她一直模糊回避。不过，当透在派对上不顾一切地当着众人的面向她表白并离去后，诗史终于做出了决定……

简介：Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

简介：酒、钱、美女组成了托马斯的生活，他的逍遥日子终结在超有钱医生老爸要他想办法完成马库斯的愿望清单，否则断绝他所有金援的那一天。打针、抽血、吃药──十二岁罕病病童马库斯的生活。当有钱有闲没目标的托马斯，遇到没钱没命有梦想的马库斯，人生双双天翻地覆，马库斯的愿望能靠废柴托马斯顺利实现吗？

简介：米歇尔（伊莎贝尔·于佩尔 Isabelle Huppert 饰）是一家游戏公司的老板，在同事和朋友们眼中，她为人冷淡疏离，行事雷厉风行，是一个无坚不摧的女人。可是，就在某一天晚上，米歇尔被闯入家中的蒙面暴徒强暴了。　　米歇尔没有报警，因为她的父亲曾是臭名昭著的连环杀人犯，而作为他的女儿，米歇尔再也不想和警方和媒体打交道了，她决定依靠自己的力量查出事件的真相。米歇尔要解决的麻烦还有很多，她的儿子娶了一个咄咄逼人的女人，她的母亲即将嫁给一个比她年纪还要小的男人，她的前夫有了新的约会对象，而她正在和她最好的朋友的丈夫偷情。某一日，暴徒再度潜入了米歇尔家中，这一次，米歇尔看清了他的面貌。

简介：

1893年，因母亲去世，加布里埃尔•香奈儿的葡萄酒商父亲将她与妹妹安托妮特抛给了奥巴兹孤儿院。成年后的香奈儿（奥黛丽•塔图 Audrey Tautou 饰）与安托妮特（玛丽•吉莲 Marie Gillain 饰）一边以缝纫为生，一边在酒吧唱歌赚钱。香奈儿因一曲《小狗可可》结识了法国百万富翁艾亭奈•巴桑（贝诺特•波维德 Benoît Poelvoorde 饰），并成为了他众多情妇中的一员。在巴桑的城堡，香奈儿开始制作女帽，并与演员艾米丽安（艾曼纽•德芙 Emmanuelle Devos）成为朋友。香奈儿对取悦巴桑的生活日益不满，同时发现爱上了巴桑的好友，英国工业家阿瑟•伯邑•卡伯（亚历桑德罗•尼沃拉 Alessandro Nivola 饰）。有了伯邑的支持，香奈儿是否便能开始她一直想要的个人事业呢？                                                                      　　本片被提名2009年欧洲电影奖观众奖。

简介：本片纪录下了爱尔兰现代建筑大师艾琳·格雷的创作与人生。这位20世纪最具有开拓性的设计者，用她独特的视野和创造性彻底改变了我们家装和建筑。她所属的那个年代，在室内装饰和家具设计领域，没有几个女人能与她相提并论。纪录片通过对多位研究格雷的学者、拍卖行、收藏家、艺术策展人等的访谈，用影像还原了这位神秘低调的建筑师，呈现了她对欧洲的建筑和室内设计审美产生的深远影响。艾琳·格雷传奇的一生,不仅是一个女性的奋斗史,更是一部自我觉醒,自我成长的励志书。

简介：暂无简介

简介：阿贝尔是个性格谨小慎微的单身男子，他妈妈则性格与之相反，热情奔放又浪漫至极。阿贝尔的妈妈爱上了一个刚出狱的魅力老男人米歇。米歇动用谜之关系帮阿贝尔妈妈开了梦想中的花店。阿贝尔感到这背后定有隐情。阿贝尔暗恋着自己的同事兼好朋友克莱门。喜欢冒险的克莱门跟阿贝尔一起暗中调查西尔维，果然发现各种可疑线索……克莱门追求刺激渐渐沉迷其中，阿贝尔为了心上人不得不铤而走险，平淡人生从此翻天覆地。

简介：电影史上极其异类的电影.　　全片的主角竟是一头驴。透过驴的眼睛，冷冷地注视着这个世界。驴在不同人的手中被虐待、被贩卖，最终被杀，透露出来的却是同样的主题。

简介：西蒙（凯德·麦拉德 Kad Merad 饰）曾是一名非常有名的小提琴演奏家，对这项乐器充满了热情与喜爱，可是如今，他却现身巴黎的一所初中之中，成为了那里的一群六年级孩子们的小提琴老师。西蒙对待音乐的态度非常的严肃，他自己的个性也十分不苟言笑，因此无法和班上的孩子们打成一片，孩子们在调皮捣蛋的同时也非常惧怕这位老师。　　阿诺（艾尔弗雷德·雷利 Alfred Renely 饰）是一个非常害羞的男孩，和班上的其他孩子不同，他对待小提琴有着和西蒙一样的热爱。阿诺的憧憬渐渐点燃了西蒙内心里快要熄灭的火焰，在阿诺的影响下，西蒙找到了人生新的方向。

简介：

一名年輕醫師搬到寧靜的鄉下，不幸成為青少年黑幫的目標；幫派準備對他做出肇事逃逸的行為。他的唯一依靠是一個十四歲的女孩，但可能會在重要時刻成為致命的傷害。

简介：皮埃尔·尼内([弗兰兹])和阿娜伊丝·德穆斯捷([新女友])新片[舍己救人](Sauver ou périr，暂译)将于本月16日开拍。该片将由弗雷德里克·特利尔([杀手一号])执导，剧本由导演和大卫·奥霍芬共同撰写。电影聚焦巴黎一位消防员，当他自己经历了一场严重的火灾后，他必须同妻子一起重建生活。

简介：一位绰号Bougnat（法语煤炭商）的黑人小男孩（Claude Amazan饰演）梦想参加夏令营。但是出发前一天，他才发现母亲没有为他报名。他感到很沮丧，希望想办法参加到夏令营的队伍中来。与此相反，14岁的萝丝（伊莎贝尔·阿佳妮饰演）拒绝加入到其他小孩子中，在集体出发前躲藏在屋顶上，但折腾一番后还是不情愿地上了车。 Bougnat想到一个办法：他改了自己的名字，跳上一列火车，假装是一个迷路的小孩，来到夏令营营地。在夏令营活动中，萝丝喜欢上了英俊潇洒的辅导员，而Bougnat在东躲西藏和各种恶作剧中也刷新着大家对这次旅程的认识......

简介：战火纷飞的第二次世界大战时所有犹太人的噩梦。作为一名犹太人，小朗曼随着父母东躲西藏，然而天性好动的孩子总是不愿承认战争的来临，向往着像别的孩子一样自由自在的生活。好心的房东太太把他带到自己乡下父母的家里……

简介：二战中德国占领下的巴黎，剧作家、导演兼剧院管理人的犹太人卢卡斯•斯坦纳（海因茨•本南特 Heinz Bennent 饰）被妻子玛丽安•斯坦纳（凯撒琳•丹尼芙 Catherine Deneuve 饰）藏入蒙马特剧院地下室，伺机逃往非占领区。身为演员的玛丽安不得不肩负起剧院管理人的事宜，雇佣了男演员伯纳德•格兰戈（杰拉尔•德帕迪约 Gérard Depardieu 饰）排练卢卡斯的新话剧。随着德军战线的扩大，卢卡斯的出逃一步步成为幻影，只好靠地下室的采暖管道来听每日的彩排，暗中进行指导……　　本片获法国恺撒奖最佳影片、最佳导演（弗朗科依斯•特吕弗）、最佳剧本、最佳剪辑、最佳摄影、最佳男主角（杰拉尔•德帕迪约）、最佳女主角（凯撒琳•丹尼芙）、最佳音乐、最佳舞台设计和最佳声音十项大奖，并获最佳男配角（海因茨•本南特）和最佳女配角（安德烈亚•费雷奥尔Andréa Ferréol）提名。本片同时获金球奖和奥斯卡奖最佳外语片提名。

简介：故事发生在1992年。马丁和上夜班的父亲住在一起，除了上学之外，他把时间都花在了自己的摄像机上。在学校挨了揍之后，助理老师送他回家，两人就此萌生了爱意。而这一切，偶然被马丁的父亲发现了……

简介：佛羅倫絲和雲遜是一對模範夫妻。　　他們有成功的事業，美滿的婚姻和可愛孩子。現在，他們想成功地離婚。　　然而，當他們同時得到他們一輩子夢寐以求工作時，這對夫婦的生活頓時變成了惡夢。由這一刻起，他們再不會退讓一分。這對從前的模範配偶向對方宣戰，千方百計要避免取得孩子的撫養權。

简介：穷极潦倒的克莉丝汀（凯瑟琳·弗洛 饰），寂寞地穿梭在巴黎市街，日复一日地寻找食物银行的补给品维生。在一个天寒地冻的冬日，八岁小男孩苏力（玛哈玛杜雅法 饰）站在她的栖息之处哭泣。询问后，克莉丝汀发现苏力跟母亲走散了，而两人的相似处境，让她们一同步上充满了爱与希望的寻亲之旅，共同勇闯巴黎的地下世界，试图寻找苏力的母亲。

简介：一个男孩因为向父母讨要零花钱失败，去当了自己的手表，却换回一张500元法郎的假钞。之后，这张假钞在很多人之间转手，最后落到了一个叫伊文（克里斯琴·佩蒂 Christian Patey 饰）的年轻人手中。伊文试着去餐馆花掉这张假钞，但被服务员发现了。警察认为他参与了假钞贩卖案而逮捕了他，但法官念他初犯，没有给他判刑。伊文释放之后，丢了工作。没有了钱，他只好和朋友去银行抢劫，却又一次栽在警察手里，被抓进监狱，被判刑三年…… 本片是布列松的最后一部作品，改编自托尔斯泰的短篇小说《伪息券》，曾获第36届戛纳电影节主竞赛单元最佳导演奖。

简介：为谋求公平并从吃力不讨好的工作中获利，一名工厂工人密谋在雇主眼皮子底下走私奢侈香水。